Treasury
3-MO 3.87% -3bp 6-MO 3.96% -3bp 1-YR 4.01% -5bp 2-YR 4.19% -6bp 3-YR 4.25% -6bp 5-YR 4.35% -5bp 7-YR 4.49% -4bp 10-YR 4.65% -4bp 20-YR 5.20% -2bp 30-YR 5.19% -3bp 3-MO 3.87% -3bp 6-MO 3.96% -3bp 1-YR 4.01% -5bp 2-YR 4.19% -6bp 3-YR 4.25% -6bp 5-YR 4.35% -5bp 7-YR 4.49% -4bp 10-YR 4.65% -4bp 20-YR 5.20% -2bp 30-YR 5.19% -3bp 3-MO 3.87% -3bp 6-MO 3.96% -3bp 1-YR 4.01% -5bp 2-YR 4.19% -6bp 3-YR 4.25% -6bp 5-YR 4.35% -5bp 7-YR 4.49% -4bp 10-YR 4.65% -4bp 20-YR 5.20% -2bp 30-YR 5.19% -3bp 3-MO 3.87% -3bp 6-MO 3.96% -3bp 1-YR 4.01% -5bp 2-YR 4.19% -6bp 3-YR 4.25% -6bp 5-YR 4.35% -5bp 7-YR 4.49% -4bp 10-YR 4.65% -4bp 20-YR 5.20% -2bp 30-YR 5.19% -3bp 3-MO 3.87% -3bp 6-MO 3.96% -3bp 1-YR 4.01% -5bp 2-YR 4.19% -6bp 3-YR 4.25% -6bp 5-YR 4.35% -5bp 7-YR 4.49% -4bp 10-YR 4.65% -4bp 20-YR 5.20% -2bp 30-YR 5.19% -3bp 3-MO 3.87% -3bp 6-MO 3.96% -3bp 1-YR 4.01% -5bp 2-YR 4.19% -6bp 3-YR 4.25% -6bp 5-YR 4.35% -5bp 7-YR 4.49% -4bp 10-YR 4.65% -4bp 20-YR 5.20% -2bp 30-YR 5.19% -3bp
US Treasury par yield curve · Aug 7 · Source: U.S. Treasury
Monday, August 10, 2026
U.S. Edition
Form 8-K, Item 4.01, 10 August 2026

A mandatory partner rotation put an entire audit out to tender at National Energy Services Reunited, and Grant Thornton lost it while keeping one more year of work

A close photograph of a sunflower head filling the whole frame, the central seed disc packed into tight interlocking spirals of small olive and gold florets, ringed by broad yellow petals that run off every edge. No text, brand mark, person or place is in view.
Photo: Tom Fisk / Pexels

Nothing went wrong here, and the form makes the company prove it twice.

National Energy Services Reunited told the Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday that its audit committee had concluded a competitive tender for its audit and picked a different firm. Grant Thornton Audit and Accounting Limited, Dubai Branch, is out. PricewaterhouseCoopers Limited Partnership, Dubai Branch, is in.

What set the tender running is the part worth reading. The lead audit engagement partner was coming up for a required rotation, and the audit committee decided that the rotation was an appropriate moment to review the whole engagement rather than just the person signing it. The process started at the beginning of the second quarter. It closed on 4 August.

The handover runs two years

The dismissal is not immediate and does not create a gap. It takes effect only when Grant Thornton finishes its audit of the financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2026, an engagement the filing says is unaffected. PwC's appointment is effective for the audit of the year ending 31 December 2027.

So the incumbent audits one more full year, then leaves, and the successor starts on the year after that.

What Item 4.01 makes a company say

The form exists to catch the auditor change that follows a fight, so it asks direct questions and the answers are the disclosure.

Grant Thornton's reports on the 2025 and 2024 financial statements carried no adverse opinion and no disclaimer, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. There were no disagreements on accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, across both of those years and the interim period through 4 August 2026. The company gave the outgoing firm the filing before it went in and asked for a letter to the Commission saying whether it agrees, which is filed as Exhibit 16.1.

The company also had not consulted PwC during those periods about how to treat any specific transaction or what opinion might be rendered, which is the question the form asks about the incoming firm.

The one item that is not housekeeping

Item 304 also requires the recitation of reportable events, and that pulls an older disclosure back onto the page.

In its annual report on Form 20-F for 2024, filed on 28 March 2025, the company disclosed a material weakness relating to tone at the top sufficient to ensure a culture of compliance with its own accounting, finance and internal control policies. The filing breaks it into three parts: no effective organisational structure to promote effective internal control, no effective communication protocols to make sure accounting issues were escalated and resolved in time, and insufficient technical accounting resources with the knowledge, experience and training the company's reporting requirements demanded.

That weakness was remediated during the year ended 31 December 2025, the filing says. There were no other reportable events.