Treasury
3-MO 3.83% +1bp 6-MO 3.98% unch 1-YR 4.08% +4bp 2-YR 4.28% +5bp 3-YR 4.34% +4bp 5-YR 4.45% +7bp 7-YR 4.59% +7bp 10-YR 4.75% +7bp 20-YR 5.28% +6bp 30-YR 5.27% +6bp 3-MO 3.83% +1bp 6-MO 3.98% unch 1-YR 4.08% +4bp 2-YR 4.28% +5bp 3-YR 4.34% +4bp 5-YR 4.45% +7bp 7-YR 4.59% +7bp 10-YR 4.75% +7bp 20-YR 5.28% +6bp 30-YR 5.27% +6bp 3-MO 3.83% +1bp 6-MO 3.98% unch 1-YR 4.08% +4bp 2-YR 4.28% +5bp 3-YR 4.34% +4bp 5-YR 4.45% +7bp 7-YR 4.59% +7bp 10-YR 4.75% +7bp 20-YR 5.28% +6bp 30-YR 5.27% +6bp 3-MO 3.83% +1bp 6-MO 3.98% unch 1-YR 4.08% +4bp 2-YR 4.28% +5bp 3-YR 4.34% +4bp 5-YR 4.45% +7bp 7-YR 4.59% +7bp 10-YR 4.75% +7bp 20-YR 5.28% +6bp 30-YR 5.27% +6bp 3-MO 3.83% +1bp 6-MO 3.98% unch 1-YR 4.08% +4bp 2-YR 4.28% +5bp 3-YR 4.34% +4bp 5-YR 4.45% +7bp 7-YR 4.59% +7bp 10-YR 4.75% +7bp 20-YR 5.28% +6bp 30-YR 5.27% +6bp 3-MO 3.83% +1bp 6-MO 3.98% unch 1-YR 4.08% +4bp 2-YR 4.28% +5bp 3-YR 4.34% +4bp 5-YR 4.45% +7bp 7-YR 4.59% +7bp 10-YR 4.75% +7bp 20-YR 5.28% +6bp 30-YR 5.27% +6bp
US Treasury par yield curve · Jul 31 · Source: U.S. Treasury
Sunday, August 2, 2026
U.S. Edition
JMMC

OPEC's monitoring committee has repeated its April wording on maritime routes and attacks on energy infrastructure word for word, and the sentence commending alternative export routes is not in it

A close photograph of a brushed metal surface scattered with fine beads of condensation, each droplet catching the light against faint circular polishing marks in the metal beneath. The frame is filled edge to edge by the surface and holds no object, person, lettering or brand mark.
Photo: Patrick / Pexels

The wording has not changed since April.

The Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee held its 67th meeting by videoconference on 2 August, and three of its paragraphs are identical, word for word, to ones it published on 5 April. The committee "highlighted the critical importance of safeguarding international maritime routes to ensure the uninterrupted flow of energy". It "expressed concern regarding attacks on energy infrastructure, noting that restoring damaged energy assets to full capacity is both costly and takes a long time". It stressed that actions undermining energy supply security "increase market volatility".

The four months in between were not quiet ones for the routes in question. This publication has reported attacks logged in the Strait of Hormuz as recently as the night of 31 July, and an Iraq to Turkey agreement putting a floor of 750,000 barrels a day under a pipeline to the Mediterranean. The committee's description of the problem is the one it wrote in the spring.

One sentence did come out. In April the committee "commended the DoC countries that took the initiative to ensure the continued availability of supplies, particularly through the use of alternative export routes, which have contributed to reducing market volatility". That sentence is not in the August statement, and the August statement does not say why.

Whether it survived the meeting in between cannot be established from this source. The April statement scheduled the 66th meeting for 7 June, and no 66th statement appears on OPEC's press releases page, which lists the 64th, the 65th and the 67th with nothing between the last two. What OPEC published on 7 June was the 41st ministerial meeting statement and the monthly production release. So the most recent committee text available for comparison is four months old, and the gap is a gap in the record rather than proof that nothing was said.

Two other things are now on it. The committee reviewed crude production data for May and June 2026 and "noted the overall conformity" of the countries in the Declaration of Cooperation, publishing no figure for either month. And the membership list is shorter: April named Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Algeria and Venezuela, and August names that list without the United Arab Emirates.

The next meeting is 4 October.

The document: Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, '67th Meeting of the Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee', press release dated 2 August 2026. Downloaded and read in full here, HTTP 200, 208,975 bytes; no fetch-tool summary was relied on and every quoted passage below was matched character for character against the extracted text. Compared mechanically, sentence by sentence, against the primary document for the previous published meeting: '65th Meeting of the Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee', dated 5 April 2026, at https://www.opec.org/pr-detail/596-5-april-2026.html. Identical in both: the sentence that the Committee 'highlighted the critical importance of safeguarding international maritime routes to ensure the uninterrupted flow of energy'; the sentence that it 'expressed concern regarding attacks on energy infrastructure, noting that restoring damaged energy assets to full capacity is both costly and takes a long time, thereby affecting overall supply availability'; and the sentence that 'any actions undermining energy supply security, whether through attacks on infrastructure or disruption of international maritime routes, increase market volatility and weaken the collective efforts under the DoC to support market stability for the benefit of producers, consumers, and the global economy'. Present in the 5 April release and absent from the 2 August release: 'In this regard, the Committee commended the DoC countries that took the initiative to ensure the continued availability of supplies, particularly through the use of alternative export routes, which have contributed to reducing market volatility.' Present in the 2 August release and absent from the 5 April one: the sentence that the Committee 'reviewed the crude oil production data for the months of May and June 2026 and noted the overall conformity for OPEC and non-OPEC countries participating in the Declaration of Cooperation (DoC)', which carries no figure, and the sentence reaffirming continued monitoring of adherence to the adjustments decided at the 38th OPEC and non-OPEC Ministerial Meeting of 5 December 2024 and the additional voluntary adjustments agreed at the 52nd JMMC of 1 February 2024. Membership was read off the two releases: 5 April lists 'Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, UAE, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Algeria and Venezuela'; 2 August lists 'Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Algeria and Venezuela'. On the intervening meeting, as verified rather than assumed: the 5 April release states that the 66th meeting was scheduled for 7 June 2026, and no 66th statement is present on OPEC's press releases page, which carries the 64th (1 February 2026), the 65th (5 April 2026) and the 67th (2 August 2026) and nothing between the second and third. The two releases OPEC published on 7 June 2026 are the 41st OPEC and non-OPEC Ministerial Meeting press statement and the seven country production release. Direct URL probes for a 7 June or 8 June JMMC detail page at the two identifiers missing from the sequence, 595 and 603, each returned HTTP 302 rather than a document. The absence is therefore recorded as an absence from this source and not as evidence that no meeting took place. Next meeting date as stated in the 2 August release: 4 October 2026. The comparison is against April because April is the most recent published statement available, not because June was skipped..