Treasury
3-MO 3.96% +1bp 6-MO 4.08% -1bp 1-YR 4.14% -1bp 2-YR 4.33% -4bp 3-YR 4.36% -4bp 5-YR 4.43% -3bp 7-YR 4.55% -3bp 10-YR 4.69% -2bp 20-YR 5.18% -2bp 30-YR 5.16% -1bp 3-MO 3.96% +1bp 6-MO 4.08% -1bp 1-YR 4.14% -1bp 2-YR 4.33% -4bp 3-YR 4.36% -4bp 5-YR 4.43% -3bp 7-YR 4.55% -3bp 10-YR 4.69% -2bp 20-YR 5.18% -2bp 30-YR 5.16% -1bp 3-MO 3.96% +1bp 6-MO 4.08% -1bp 1-YR 4.14% -1bp 2-YR 4.33% -4bp 3-YR 4.36% -4bp 5-YR 4.43% -3bp 7-YR 4.55% -3bp 10-YR 4.69% -2bp 20-YR 5.18% -2bp 30-YR 5.16% -1bp 3-MO 3.96% +1bp 6-MO 4.08% -1bp 1-YR 4.14% -1bp 2-YR 4.33% -4bp 3-YR 4.36% -4bp 5-YR 4.43% -3bp 7-YR 4.55% -3bp 10-YR 4.69% -2bp 20-YR 5.18% -2bp 30-YR 5.16% -1bp 3-MO 3.96% +1bp 6-MO 4.08% -1bp 1-YR 4.14% -1bp 2-YR 4.33% -4bp 3-YR 4.36% -4bp 5-YR 4.43% -3bp 7-YR 4.55% -3bp 10-YR 4.69% -2bp 20-YR 5.18% -2bp 30-YR 5.16% -1bp 3-MO 3.96% +1bp 6-MO 4.08% -1bp 1-YR 4.14% -1bp 2-YR 4.33% -4bp 3-YR 4.36% -4bp 5-YR 4.43% -3bp 7-YR 4.55% -3bp 10-YR 4.69% -2bp 20-YR 5.18% -2bp 30-YR 5.16% -1bp
US Treasury par yield curve · Jul 24 · Source: U.S. Treasury
Sunday, July 26, 2026
U.S. Edition
Iran

Iran says a Ukrainian strike killed a sailor on a commercial ship in the Caspian, and Kyiv says it hit vessels carrying military cargo

Close macro of a heaped pile of heavy rusted chain, links overlapping in orange and brown, with no vessel or setting visible.
Photo: Castorly Stock / Pexels

Two governments describe the same ship in different words.

Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs published a statement on Saturday evening condemning what it calls a Ukrainian attack on an Iranian commercial vessel in the Caspian Sea in the early hours of Saturday, 25 July. The statement says the attack caused an explosion aboard the ship that killed one sailor and injured another, describes it as a violation of Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, and calls it an act of aggression that could further inflame and expand the ongoing conflict. Tehran summoned Ukraine's chargé d'affaires.

Ukraine names the targets differently. President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on social media that Ukrainian forces achieved results from long-range strikes in the waters of the Caspian Sea, hitting vessels used in military cargo shipments involving Iran as well as a warship, according to the report by Dmytro Basmat at The Kyiv Independent. Ukraine's security service, the SBU, told that outlet the vessel it struck had been operating while evading international sanctions and had shipped military cargo between the two countries. Zelensky did not identify the commercial ship Tehran named, and The Kyiv Independent says in its own copy that it cannot verify the claims made by Iranian officials.

The Iranian statement addresses that gap only obliquely. It describes the attack as one explicitly acknowledged by the head of that regime, and it reiterates that Iran has never intervened in the Russia and Ukraine conflict.

Then the diplomacy. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi raised the strike in a telephone call with the European Union's High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Kaja Kallas, and called for a firm response from the United Nations Security Council, the European Union and the international community, according to a statement from his office reported by Al Jazeera. The ministry statement itself asks European countries and all UN member states to hold the Ukrainian government accountable. It closes by saying Iran will not hesitate to defend its national interests and security under the inherent right of self-defence.

The commercial context came from Al Jazeera's correspondent in Tehran, Tohid Asadi, who said the attacks on Iran's northern coast put extra pressure on Iranian maritime trade at a time when the country is already dealing with a US blockade on its southern coast.

Several things are not established here and are left that way. The vessel is not named in either account, no tonnage or cargo manifest appears anywhere in the record this desk could reach, and the casualty figures are Iran's own. Ukraine has given no casualty account at all. The two descriptions of what the ship was carrying are set out above as each party stated them, and nothing in this item resolves which is correct.