Treasury
3-MO 3.82% -1bp 6-MO 3.98% +1bp 1-YR 4.04% unch 2-YR 4.23% +1bp 3-YR 4.30% +1bp 5-YR 4.38% +1bp 7-YR 4.52% +1bp 10-YR 4.68% +1bp 20-YR 5.22% +1bp 30-YR 5.21% +1bp 3-MO 3.82% -1bp 6-MO 3.98% +1bp 1-YR 4.04% unch 2-YR 4.23% +1bp 3-YR 4.30% +1bp 5-YR 4.38% +1bp 7-YR 4.52% +1bp 10-YR 4.68% +1bp 20-YR 5.22% +1bp 30-YR 5.21% +1bp 3-MO 3.82% -1bp 6-MO 3.98% +1bp 1-YR 4.04% unch 2-YR 4.23% +1bp 3-YR 4.30% +1bp 5-YR 4.38% +1bp 7-YR 4.52% +1bp 10-YR 4.68% +1bp 20-YR 5.22% +1bp 30-YR 5.21% +1bp 3-MO 3.82% -1bp 6-MO 3.98% +1bp 1-YR 4.04% unch 2-YR 4.23% +1bp 3-YR 4.30% +1bp 5-YR 4.38% +1bp 7-YR 4.52% +1bp 10-YR 4.68% +1bp 20-YR 5.22% +1bp 30-YR 5.21% +1bp 3-MO 3.82% -1bp 6-MO 3.98% +1bp 1-YR 4.04% unch 2-YR 4.23% +1bp 3-YR 4.30% +1bp 5-YR 4.38% +1bp 7-YR 4.52% +1bp 10-YR 4.68% +1bp 20-YR 5.22% +1bp 30-YR 5.21% +1bp 3-MO 3.82% -1bp 6-MO 3.98% +1bp 1-YR 4.04% unch 2-YR 4.23% +1bp 3-YR 4.30% +1bp 5-YR 4.38% +1bp 7-YR 4.52% +1bp 10-YR 4.68% +1bp 20-YR 5.22% +1bp 30-YR 5.21% +1bp
US Treasury par yield curve · Jul 30 · Source: U.S. Treasury
Friday, July 31, 2026
U.S. Edition
Filings

A Nasdaq listed data centre company has withdrawn its first quarter accounts and says it cannot yet quantify how wrong they were

A close photograph of a pale grey cement surface filling the frame, the fine aggregate showing as darker flecks throughout and faint hairline crazing crossing the upper left, with no marking or lettering anywhere on it.
Photo: cottonbro studio / Pexels

The audit committee reached its conclusion on 24 July. New Era Energy & Digital told the market six days later, at four minutes past five on a Thursday evening, in a filing carrying one item and no exhibit.

Item 4.02 is the item a company files when its own published accounts have stopped being usable. The determination, taken after consultation with management and with Weaver and Tidwell, the company's independent registered public accounting firm, is that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months to 31 March 2026, filed on 15 May, require restatement and should no longer be relied upon.

One error has a number, and it is the small one

The company says it recorded approximately $1.4 million of legal and professional fees as general and administrative expense when those fees were direct and incremental costs of specific debt and equity transactions, and should have been deferred. Debt issuance costs of that kind are presented as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt, or held in other current assets where the debt has not been issued. Equity issuance costs are charged against the gross proceeds of a completed offering.

That is a reclassification. It moves cost off one line and onto another, and the filing says the company's analysis of it is still going.

The second error is the one without a figure. Performance stock units were granted to certain executive officers during the same quarter, and the company says the grant-date fair value of those awards, originally determined at $23.5 million, "was inappropriately calculated and understated". Under ASC 718 the grant-date fair value drives how much compensation cost is recognised and when. The company states plainly that it cannot yet quantify the effect, and that the effect may be material.

A third review, on a data centre

Alongside both, management is evaluating how it accounted for the acquisition on 16 January 2026 of the remaining 50 percent membership interest in Texas Critical Data Centers, LLC. It has engaged a valuation expert. It says it cannot quantify anything if an error is found, because it has not yet determined whether one exists.

Three open items. One number between them.

What the company does say

The errors have no effect on the cash position, and no income tax effect is expected, because a full valuation allowance sits against the deferred tax assets. What the errors do reach is net loss, net loss per share, total assets, total liabilities, total stockholders' equity, the cash flow statement presentation and the statement of changes in stockholders' equity.

None of this arrives without warning. The original Form 10-Q already said that disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of 31 March 2026, and already identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. The filing repeats both sentences rather than adding to them.

Investors are told to rely only on the Form 10-Q/A when it comes, and on nothing issued about the quarter before it, including press releases, earnings releases and investor presentations.

The document: New Era Energy & Digital, Inc., Form 8-K, accession 0001213900-26-083411, accepted by EDGAR 2026-07-30 at 17:04:09 Eastern, CIK 0002028336, Commission file number 001-42433, state of incorporation Nevada, principal executive offices 200 N. Loraine Street, Suite 1324, Midland, Texas 79701. Common stock trades as NUAI and warrants as NUAIW, both on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC. Date of report 30 July 2026, date of earliest event reported 24 July 2026. Item information on the submission header: one entry, Item 4.02, Non-Reliance on Previously Issued Financial Statements or Related Audit Report or Completed Interim Review. The document was retrieved from EDGAR and extracted to text and read end to end on 30 July 2026. No fetch-tool summary was relied on. Sentences quoted or relied on in the brief, verbatim from Item 4.02: the audit committee 'determined, after consultation with management and Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P., the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, that the previously issued unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements filed in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2026 ... initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ... on May 15, 2026 ... require restatement and should no longer be relied upon'; 'The Company recorded approximately $1.4 million of legal and professional fees as general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026, that were direct and incremental costs of specific debt and equity transactions and should have been deferred'; 'The grant-date fair value of the PSU awards granted during the three months ended March 31, 2026, as originally determined of $23.5 million, was inappropriately calculated and understated'; 'the Company is unable at this time to quantify the effect of the Stock-Based Compensation Errors on the Affected Period; the effect may be material to the Original Form 10-Q'; 'management is evaluating the Company's accounting for its acquisition on January 16, 2026, of the remaining 50% membership interest in Texas Critical Data Centers, LLC'; 'management is evaluating certain components of the fair value of the acquisition and has engaged a valuation expert'; 'The Company is unable at this time to quantify the combined effect of all of the errors described in this Report on the Affected Period, including the effect on net loss and net loss per share'; 'The errors affect net loss, net loss per share, total assets, total liabilities and total stockholder's equity as well as the presentation of the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows and the condensed consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity'; 'The Expense Classification Errors and Stock-Based Compensation Errors have no effect on the Company's cash position'; 'The correction of the Stock-Based Compensation Errors and Expense Classification Errors is not expected to have an income tax effect because the Company maintains a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets'; and 'As stated in the Original Form 10-Q, management concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2026 and has identified a material weakness in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.' The six-day interval between the 24 July determination and the 30 July filing is computed from the two dates printed on the cover page of the document..